It’s a rare day when all six of these companies can agree on something, but that day seems to have arrived, thanks to the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Google first showed tepid support for Apple in this fight last week, when CEO Sundar Pichai tweeted that “forcing companies to enable hacking could compromise users’ privacy.” Then it seemed like Microsoft might be siding with the FBI, when co-founder and former CEO Bill Gates gave an interview to the The Financial Times earlier this week saying that the FBI was only looking for Apple’s help in this specific case. Apple has repeatedly contended that what the FBI is asking for — a way to bypass the auto-deletion feature on an iPhone 5C when a password is guessed incorrectly too many times — could be used to compromise other iPhones, including the hundreds of millions used by Apple’s customers around the world. But Gates, who is now just an “advisor” at Microsoft, later walked back those remarks, and today Microsoft’s president and chief legal officer Brad Sims testified before Congress that his company “wholeheartedly” supports Apple and will be filing an amicus brief in the court case to that effect (amicus briefs are legal documents filed by parties who aren’t directly involved in the case, but who have a strong interest in the outcome and may be affected by it.) Other smaller tech companies and digital advocacy groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation have also said they plan to support Apple by filing such amicus briefs as the case moves forward. The broad, seemingly unified coalition in tech against the FBI and the government order in this case is striking. I can only think of a few examples where U.S. tech companies and advocacy groups formed anything like this kind of unanimous front in recent years, namely the opposition to the International Telecommunications Union cyber agreement of 2012, the successful bid to kill the American SOPA and PIPA cybersecurity bills of that same year, and the criticism of another failed cybersecurity bill called CISPA. Yet none of these examples have had so many big tech companies on the same side against a government. Whether the words of some of America’s most powerful and well-known companies makes a difference to the courts, we’ll find out soon enough. In the meantime, Apple and the FBI are set to testify to their positions in a hearing before the U.S. Congress on March 1st. Congress itself may end up passing a law that resolves this case and creates a framework for future situations like this. At stake is the issue of security and privacy of our most personal devices: can and should they be compromised at the government’s bidding in criminal and terror investigations? And to what extent? That’s the question before the courts and Congress now, and it seems that the FBI has succeeded in uniting most of Silicon Valley’s power players against it. Correction: this article originally misstated the name of Google’s CEO as Satya Nadella, who is in fact, Microsoft’s CEO. We have since corrected the error and apologize for it.
